Plane I Toolset | toolkit

top of page

This site was designed with the

website builder. Create your website today.Start Now

TOPICS

Experiences from Countries

Toolset: 22 Tools

4. How to Successfully Conduct a Diagnostic Analyis of the Situation?

3. How to Develop a Framework for the Diagnostic Analysis of the Situation?

2. Who Should Conduct and Lead the Diagnostic Analysis of the Current Situation?

1. When and How to Get Started?

Plane I Toolset

Next Page

Previous Page

Tool 1.1.1. Start-up Situations Public Administration Reconstruction Start-up Situations Tool 1.1.1 emphasizes that the start-up process varies greatly from country to country further to the nature and the magnitude of conflict. Experience has shown a wide array of situations in which start-up could emerge. This tool underscores height of them. However it is important to note that PAR may start from different areas from which the four planes are accordingly suited.	Tool 1.1.2.1. Get Starting Approach Tool 1.1.2 identifies the steps needed to reach a common understanding of post-conflict reconstruction challenges and solutions.
1.1.2.2.Diagnostic S.A Advantages Tool 1.1.2.2 shows how a diagnostic analysis of the situation adds value to public administration reconstruction process.	Tool 1.2.1. Multi-Stakeholders Lead Involving Multi-stakeholders’ Leadership in Public Administration Reconstruction Tool 1.2.1 highlights that after conflict, leaders from all sectors of society must be included in the public administration reconstruction process .
Tool 1.2.2.1. Facilitator Qualities Qualities of a Competent Facilitator Tool 1.2.2.1. identifies the qualifies of a competent facilitator, being individual, group of individuals or institution, who is capable of facilitating the reconstruction process in a more positive and objective way while building trust among engaging parties without yielding negative results due to lack of local and sufficient knowledge of reality.	Tool 1.2.2.2.Facilitator Role & Act Roles of the Facilitator in the Four Principal Stages of Public Administration Reconstruction (PAR) After Confllict Tool 1.2.2.2. identifies the stages a facilitator must take during Public Administration Reconstruction (PAR) process. To go through, this tool is pointing out the actions, roles and forms the facilitator must incorporate and accommodate.
Tool 1.2.3.1. Stakeholders Diversity Who Should be Involved in the Reconstruction Process? Tool 1.2.3.1. identifies the variety of stakeholders who should be involved in the reconstruction process. Public sector, civil society and the private sector as well as all development partners in the country should be mobilized to actively participate in the analysis of the situation and the planning for reconstructing public administration.	Tool 1.2.3.2. Actors & Contributions Actors and their Support In the Public Administration reconstruction process after Conflict. Tool 1.2.3.2. provides a snapshot of the possible roles that the different actors in post-conflict situations may undertake in the process of public administration reconstruction.
Tool 1.2.4.1.S.A Workshop Structure Example of Participatory Workshop Design for a Diagnostic Situation Analysis Tool 1.2.4.1. provides an example for possible structure of a national or local workshops pertaining to situation analysis .	Tool 1.2.4.2. S.A Approaches & Metho Strengths and Weaknesses of Different Approaches and Methodologies for the Situation Analysis Tool 1.2.4.2. shows various approaches that have been utilized in different countries emerging from conflict. It outlines strengths and weaknesses of each approach and methodology as observed in practice.
Tool 3.1 Situation Analysis STAR Framework for Public Administration Reconstruction (PAR) Tool 1.3.1 provides a framework that diagnostically analyses the post-conflict situation, from the socio-political-economic and historical situation to the analysis of the present environment and organizational situation.	1.3.3.1 Framework for a Diagnostic Analysis of the Environment Tool 1.3.2 highlights the importance of analyzing past forms of governance, social and demographic characteristics of a country, economic level of development, as well as natural resources available.
Tool 1.3.3.2 Factors Necessitating In-Depth Inquiry Tool 1.3.3 identifies how governance and type of government may vary between different countries, by considering political, physical, economic, and environmental dimensions.	Tool 1.3.4.1 Public Administration Assessment Framework Tool 1.3.4 provides an overview of the public administration assessment framework that highlights the areas that need to be explored when assessing public administration capacity [master document].
Tool 1.3.5.1 Influence of Beliefs and Values on Public Governance Tool 1.3.5 illustrates the central role that beliefs and values have on informing and shaping individuals’ actions, decisions, and relations.	Tool 1.3.5.2 Values and Beliefs Assessment Form Tool 1.3.6 is a form which can be used to assess beliefs and values of people to uncover the population’s perception of the former and current administration; what is wrong and what is right and how to build from it, and how the population expects the identified challenges to be addressed [master document].
Tool 1.3.5.3 Impact of Values on Governance and Institutions Tool 1.3.7 shows the different levels that need to be considered in reconstructing public administration systems and capacities, and their inter-connectedness. Internal and external individual aspects are strongly inter-related as much as the internal and visible collective aspects are also inter-linked, whatever the situation [master document].	Tool 1.4.1 How A Facilitator Can Conduct a Successful Diagnostic Analysis of the Situation Tool 1.19 outlines the factors that may contribute to a successful diagnostic analysis and to a better understanding of the national context, and the international environment [master document].
Tool 1.4.2 Checklist for a successful involvement of all stakeholders in a situation analysis (N.B: for more details, cf. tool 4.3) Tool 1.20 provides a checklist for a successful involvement of all stakeholders in a situation analysis [master document].	Tool 1.4.3 Levels of citizen’s participation Tool 1.21 provides for a matrix which shows the level of citizen’s participation in governance.
Tool 1.5.1 - Guidelines Guidelines for an effective situation analysis Tool 1.22 provides an overall guideline wrap-up for an effective analysis, by considering people’s engagement, ownership, a holistic approach, sensitivity and flexibility, and taking stock of beliefs and values.	Tool 1.5.2 - Wrap-up Tool 1.23 shows the final wrap-up, illustrating the overall analysis process from the point of getting started to the final outcome/conclusion.

Discussion Platform

YOU ARE HERE: PLANE 1: ANALYZING THE SITUATION TO UNDERSTAND THE CONTEXT AFTER CONFLICT

Twenty Two tools are available in Plane I.

Please use the arrows or click on the image below to enlarge and learn more

bottom of page